Showing posts with label 2006. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2006. Show all posts

Friday, 5 May 2006

Reshuffle no. 254,643,459,959,758,...

After a strong Conservative performance in yesterday's local elections, the results of which are now all in except for one seat, Tony Blair swung into action with a reshuffle carried out throughout the day and announced on official websites as the changes were called out.

Andrew Marr's Sunday AM programme noted last week a rumour that the reshuffle was planned to take place about now, and it has now gone through, with the Prime Minister making many key changes to the cabinet. The BBC website today prepared a rundown of the reshuffle changes, which is not quite viewable ‘at a glance.’ Here is an alternative version:

Position (With links to departmental sites)

Out! (With links to why they may have gone)

In! (With links to show troubles they've faced)

ODPM -> DCLG

John Prescott

Ruth Kelly

Deputy Prime Minister

‘’

John Prescott Holds

Foreign Secretary

Jack Straw

Margaret Beckett

Home Secretary

Charles Clarke

John Reid

Health Secretary

‘’

Patricia Hewitt Holds

Defence Secretary

John Reid

Des Browne

Education Secretary

Ruth Kelly

Alan Johnson

Trade Secretary

Alan Johnson

Alistair Darling

Transport Secretary

Alistair Darling

Douglas Alexander

Environment Secretary

Margaret Beckett

David Miliband

Chief Secretary to the Treasury

Des Browne

Stephen Timms

Leader of the Commons

Jeff Hoon

Jack Straw

Labour Party Chairman

Ian McCartney

Hazel Blears

Chief Whip

Hilary Armstrong

Jacqui Smith

Europe Minister

Douglas Alexander

Geoff Hoon

Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Inc. Minister for the Cabinet Office)

Vacant (“Minister Without Portfolio” Position)

Hilary Armstrong

Foreign Office / DTI Minister of State

N/A: New Position

Ian McCartney


The government has arguably overcome problems with ministers with perhaps greater ease under Tony Blair's leadership than any previous party in office. Nick Robinson has quoted David Cameron expressing his ‘awe’ at the Labour leader's ability to ‘walk away’ unscathed from problems that would have left a lesser politician with a major defeat. It looks like the response to the Tories' victory may be just enough to win another minor battle in the greater war.

Read the No 10 website's summary of the reshuffle. (Warning: Includes gratuitous gurning.)

See the BBC's collection of Election 2006 news.

Thursday, 13 April 2006

Words now terror offence

As of today the glorification of terrorism is officially an offence under the rules set in the 2005 Terrorism Bill, which was given Royal assent on March 30th of this year.

The bill covers many ways of protecting against terrorist activity, but its most controversial aspect is the relative harshness with which statements interpreted as glorification are to be punished.

A summary conviction on this offence, which so far applies to published rather than spoken statements, could lead to a fine or twelve months imprisonment, while conviction on an indictment could lead to a much longer term of up to seven years.
This is only three years short of the sentence applied to those who give training in terrorist activities.

Critics say that defining precisely which comments might break the new law will prove difficult, and also that the Bill contains several defences that might be applied too easily. These are some of the reasons that many people perceive the new law to be an unnecessary incursion upon free speech. In February Sir Menzies Campbell was one of the high profile figures who noted that ‘the measure could threaten civil liberties.’ Other notable opposers of the bill include the popular free speech website netfreedom.org.

Other changes brought about in the Terrorism Bill include an increased 15 year maximum period for the possession of materials which could be used for terrorist purposes, and for offences committed using radioactive materials life sentences are now applicable.

View a transcript of Charles Clarke's Terrorism Bill speech.
View the completed bill at the official Parliamentary Publications site.
Read Charles Clarke's rebuttal of The Independent's entry into the debate.